
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>General Discussion</title>
<link>https://www.cste.org/forums/topics.aspx?group=87601&amp;forum=118953</link>
<description></description>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 6 Jun 2026 10:25:13 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Mar 2020 20:19:51 GMT</pubDate>
<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; 2020 Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists </copyright>
<atom:link href="https://www.cste.org/forums/forum_rss.asp?group=87601&amp;id=118953" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<item>
<title>Internet Partner Services</title>
<link>https://www.cste.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=87601&amp;topic=1530271</link>
<guid>https://www.cste.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=87601&amp;topic=1530271</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Any counties doing Internet Partner Services (IPS)/Internet Partner Notification (IPN) who would be willing to share their policies? We are developing a process and it would be helpful to have some examples from the county level. Thanks in advance!</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Mar 2020 21:19:51 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>DIS Capacity Assessment</title>
<link>https://www.cste.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=87601&amp;topic=1406296</link>
<guid>https://www.cste.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=87601&amp;topic=1406296</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Does anyone know of a capacity assessment study that has been completed for DIS? Maybe something similar to the one completed for epidemiology capacity: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19525777 This would be very useful in position justifications. Thanks, Ben]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 03:19:33 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Initiating Investigations on CD4 only</title>
<link>https://www.cste.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=87601&amp;topic=995334</link>
<guid>https://www.cste.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=87601&amp;topic=995334</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Are there surveillance units that are initiating investigations on patients that are not in eHARS based on CD4 count only? If so, can you share your processes?<BR>Thank you.]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 13:52:56 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Contacting Providers Across State Lines</title>
<link>https://www.cste.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=87601&amp;topic=1069570</link>
<guid>https://www.cste.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=87601&amp;topic=1069570</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I'd like to get information from surveillance units that have agreements to contact providers across state lines with the purpose of obtaining case ascertainment and update information. Does anyone have policies and or procedures you'd be willing to share?</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Sharon</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2015 19:27:11 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Clinician Reporting Feedback Report Card</title>
<link>https://www.cste.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=87601&amp;topic=716470</link>
<guid>https://www.cste.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=87601&amp;topic=716470</guid>
<description><![CDATA[NYS is exploring creating diagnostic clinician feedback reports (i.e., report cards) &nbsp;to assess completeness of reporting.&nbsp;Do any jurisdictions have sample reports they could share?&nbsp; Thanks]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 3 Mar 2014 16:17:11 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Clinical Trial Participants</title>
<link>https://www.cste.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=87601&amp;topic=692720</link>
<guid>https://www.cste.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=87601&amp;topic=692720</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<P>Recently, we discovered that some national clinical trials were not reporting lab results&nbsp;for participants living in Texas.&nbsp;&nbsp;This was specifically an issue with clinical trials that process&nbsp;lab results (CD4's and VL)&nbsp;in house rather than sending the labs to a reference laboratory.&nbsp; We contacted the clinical trial companies but did not successfully convince them that they needed to report lab results.&nbsp; Have other states found&nbsp;this to be an&nbsp;issue?&nbsp; Have other states had success in getting lab reports?</P>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2013 16:43:19 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>HIV Diagnostic Testing Algorithm</title>
<link>https://www.cste.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=87601&amp;topic=683811</link>
<guid>https://www.cste.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=87601&amp;topic=683811</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p>
<p>
	Here in NYS we are communicating with
reporting laboratories and healthcare providers about the HIV Diagnostic
Testing Algorithm, I am curious as to what other state and local health
departments are doing regarding this. What methods are you using to communicate
with laboratories? Hospital labs? Healthcare providers? What methods have
worked best and what have not worked? Are you thinking of recruiting new labs
due to the algorithm, if so how are you doing this? I appreciate any
information you are willing to share. Thanks! </p>

</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 4 Dec 2013 13:49:24 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>eHARS and PRISM</title>
<link>https://www.cste.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=87601&amp;topic=672534</link>
<guid>https://www.cste.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=87601&amp;topic=672534</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<P>In New Hampshire, we are working on implementing PRISM for STD surveillance.&nbsp; We understand there are&nbsp;a few ways that PRISM and eHARS data can be linked.&nbsp; For anyone using PRISM for STD surveillance: do you link PRISM and eHARS?&nbsp; What are your methods for doing this?&nbsp; I'd appreciate any information that you might be willing to share.&nbsp; Thanks!</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 7 Nov 2013 14:02:15 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Facility Address</title>
<link>https://www.cste.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=87601&amp;topic=578496</link>
<guid>https://www.cste.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=87601&amp;topic=578496</guid>
<description><![CDATA[We're in the process of standardizing facility addresses in eHARS and are looking for suggestions.&nbsp; When facilities change addresses, are other jurisdictions creating new facility entries with the address and keeping the old facility entry separate, or changing the address?&nbsp; Some of our facilities have also changed names, how are these handled?]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 16:19:57 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Final ACRF:Lab Manufacturer</title>
<link>https://www.cste.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=87601&amp;topic=559491</link>
<guid>https://www.cste.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=87601&amp;topic=559491</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<P>The final ACRF posted on the Sharepoint site is asking for 'manufacturer' for the three HIV anitbody tests on the laboratory data page which previously was not in the draft. Does anyone&nbsp;know the rationale for colecting this, and also are you collecting this presently? Thank you.</P>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 15:04:45 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
