CSTE logo
This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are used for visitor analysis, others are essential to making our site function properly and improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Click Accept to consent and dismiss this message or Deny to leave this website. Read our Privacy Statement for more.
CSTE Features
Blog Home All Blogs

CSTE Hill Update: FY 2024 Appropriations and the President’s Budget

Posted By Meg Riley, Vice President CRD Associates, Wednesday, May 10, 2023
Updated: Wednesday, May 10, 2023

Leaders on Capitol Hill are in the throes of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2024 Appropriations process, determining where to invest scarce federal resources as Democrats and Republicans in Congress simultaneously debate how to approach lifting the federal debt ceiling, which could be reached as soon as June 1. The divided Congress must not only agree on how to fund the federal government before the end of the fiscal year on September 30, but must also raise the debt ceiling to ensure the United States does not default on its credit obligations, which would be unprecedented and have far-reaching economic consequences.

A first step in the federal appropriations process is the release of the President’s budget request. While the President’s budget has no force in law, it is an important display of spending and policy priorities, indicating to Congress and the public where the administration believes federal resources should be allocated. On March 9, while members of the CSTE Executive Board were holding their annual virtual Capitol Hill advocacy day, President Biden released his FY 2024 budget request—setting the stage for the House and Senate Appropriations Committees to move forward.

The President’s budget proposed $340 million for the Data Modernization Initiative (DMI) at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), a substantial $125 million dollar increase over the amount appropriated in FY 2023. This represents an important prioritization of the continued efforts of the DMI at CDC. CSTE supports this proposal and has advocated strongly for this increased investment in FY 2024 to help CDC implement advanced technologies to address ongoing threats to public health and prepare our nation for the next pandemic. As technology evolves, our public health data systems will require continual updates and staff will need to be regularly trained. As such, CSTE and our partners in the Data: Elemental to Health campaign call on Congress to support the President’s budget request and provide sustained, annual appropriations to DMI.

House Republicans, including Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), have criticized the President’s budget for its increases to non-defense discretionary spending, which includes funding for critical CDC programs like DMI. This is part of a larger House Republican effort to cut non-defense discretionary spending across the board, which they pledged to do when they gained the majority. On April 26, the House passed legislation that would raise the federal debt ceiling while making deep cuts to federally funded programs and rescinding unspent COVID-19 funds. While this legislation will not pass the Senate, it illustrates the deep divide between the two parties, who must come together in some manner to address the debt ceiling and FY 2024 federal spending.

Later this month, the House Appropriations Committee will begin marking up FY 2024 funding bills. The Senate Appropriations Committee has pledged to advance legislation under regular order (moving bills through committee mark-ups) as well. CSTE will continue to call on both chambers of Congress to make essential, sustained investments in DMI and other critical public health programs, including the Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity program and will keep members updated at key stages of the process.

Meghan Riley is vice president at CRD Associates, LLC, which represents CSTE’s interests on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC

This post has not been tagged.

Permalink
 

CSTE’s AEF Program: 20 Years of Training the Next Generation of Applied Epidemiologists

Posted By CSTE, Thursday, April 6, 2023
Updated: Thursday, April 6, 2023

 

CSTE’s AEF Program: 20 Years of Training the Next Generation of Applied Epidemiologists

Pop Quiz: What do Finding Nemo, the Safari internet browser and iTunes all have in common? All three are celebrating their 20th anniversary this year.

CSTE is pleased to add the Applied Epidemiology Fellowship (AEF) to that list of milestone anniversaries! Since 2003, AEF has guided recent graduates through the expanding field of applied epidemiology. In 20 years, CSTE has placed 519 fellows in 45 states and the District of Columbia, 27 local, three territorial, and one tribal jurisdiction. AEF participants receive two years of on-the-job training at a state or local health department under the guidance of two experienced mentors. During the program, all fellows work in public health emergency responses and 70% of fellowship graduates remain in the governmental public health sector.

In celebration of these two decades of shaping the next generation of epis, we spoke with two fellows, past and present, on what led them to AEF, their experience in the program, and the doors it has opened for their careers.

Note: These interviews have been edited for length and clarity.

Past Fellow – Ellyn Marder, DrPH, MPH, Tennessee

Ellyn Marder was an AEF fellow from 2012 to 2014, working at the Tennessee Department of Health. After graduating, she worked as a surveillance epidemiologist for CDC and is now a Senior Epidemiologist in Washington state. Ellyn has a BS in chemical science from Florida State University and earned an MPH in epidemiology from Emory University in Atlanta.

Q: Was there a certain “aha” moment you had that led you being interested in epidemiology?

In college, I really kind of struggled to figure out what it was I was interested in. I liked the concept of public health, I loved science, but I was a little lost at how to apply it. My advisor suggested I take population health courses. Through being exposed to all of these different concepts, it drove me to epidemiology, where I could still bring in the science and understanding of diseases and transmission mechanisms, but really use my skills best working with data.

Q: How did you become interested in applying for CSTE’s AEF Program?

I interned at CSTE when I was in my MPH program at Emory. So, I became really familiar with the CSTE staff and members as I attended work group, subcommittee calls, other meetings, and worked on projects with the staff. The more I learned from members and staff about what kind of work was happening at the state and local level, I just became really excited to have that experience myself. So very luckily, I was able to apply to AEF and be accepted.

Q: You completed your fellowship at the Tennessee Department of Health. What did you work on and what was a typical day like?

A lot of what I did was outbreak investigations, whether those were from animal contact, restaurants or widely distributed food products where those were usually multi-state outbreaks. I was doing patient interviewing, designing case control studies, collecting the data, analyzing the data, and helping inform any kind of public health measures we needed to take, what testing we should be doing at the lab. Did we need to get receipts to find out what did consumers buy at Costco or wherever else it was? What food item on this restaurant menu could have made them sick? And then doing case finding, calling everyone who maybe dined at a restaurant that day to ask them if they also got sick so that we could figure out what was causing the illness.

Q: What lessons did you learn during your time in the AEF Program?

I think the biggest lesson is I gained so much confidence in my skills and expertise as an epidemiologist. I have phenomenal mentors and support at the state health department who gave me opportunities to try things, advice for when something wasn’t working, and then praise when something did that really showed me where I could provide value throughout my career. And that really has just driven everything I do. I know where I can provide value in different meetings, in different context. I have that expertise and because of the confidence that they instilled in me, I know there’s so much that I can contribute now and I’m excited to contribute it.

Q: What advice do you have for someone thinking about applying to AEF?

Do it a hundred percent. If I could go back, I would be a fellow. I tell everyone that every day. I think the fellowship provides such a unique opportunity to be on the ground, learn from renowned experts at state health departments, contribute in such a meaningful way while learning so much about what you’re going to enjoy in public health to help shape your career. I think anyone considering it, even folks who aren’t sure about the direction they want to take, I think the AEF fellowship just provides such a great foundation and a starting place for what public health can be for your career.

Current Fellow – Hannah Lund, MPH, Pennsylvania

Hannah Lund is a current fellow at the Pennsylvania Department of Health where she specializes in infectious disease. Hannah has a BA in Biology from Southwest Minnesota State University and earned an MPH in epidemiology from the University of Nebraska Medical Center.

Q: Was there a certain “aha” moment you had that led you being interested in epidemiology?

I was a junior in college in undergrad, and I was majoring in biology, and I wasn’t really sure what it was that I wanted to do, and I happened to just pick up a book and I read about what they were doing. It was a former EIS officer who went on to work at CDC for several years, and he outlined how he got into public health, and the investigations he did while in EIS, and then working for CDC, and I was like, “Wow, that sounds like something I would really like to do.”

Q: How did you become interested in applying for CSTE’s AEF Program?

My career counselor at University of Nebraska was outstanding. She told me about a lot of different paths you can take leaving the MPH program here and mentioned CSTE’s AEF. We also had a PhD student who was a former CSTE fellow. I had the chance to hear her speak about her AEF experience, what she did and how it helped her. And after that day, I thought, “Oh, that seems like something I would really like to do.”

Q: Your fellowship is at the Pennsylvania Department of Health. Walk us through a typical day?

I’m in the Infectious Diseases team, but don’t have a specific focus. I am really spread out through everywhere. Somebody has a project, and they need help on it, my supervisors ask, “Hannah, do you want to do this?” So, I’ve helped with hepatitis, I’ve helped with some environmental projects with wastewater, influenza and vectorborne. I’ve done some COVID stuff. I’ve really just been kind of spread throughout and it’s been great, because I get to experience all these different things, and I get to see what I like and I don’t like.

Q: What are your future career goals?

I would say a dream job would be working with enteric diseases. I have really enjoyed doing interviews for any enterics outbreak. I like to stay busy and always have things going on, and that’s something that is busy year-round. Everything has its season, but there’s always something happening. And so, I think that would be my dream job.

CSTE established the Applied Epidemiology Fellowship (AEF) in 2003, closely modeled the program after the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Epidemic Intelligence Service (EIS) program, which uses a mentorship model to train recent graduates in the expanding field of applied epidemiology. To learn more about AEF, please visit the newly refreshed and relaunched AEF website for more information – www.cstefellows.org.

This post has not been tagged.

Permalink
 

Best of Both Worlds: AEF Fellow Bonnie Bloxom on Studying Abroad and Combining Epi and Clinical MCH Work

Posted By Ben Warden, CSTE, Wednesday, April 5, 2023
Updated: Friday, March 31, 2023

Best of Both Worlds: AEF Fellow Bonnie Bloxom on Studying Abroad and Combining Epi and Clinical MCH Work

By Ben Warden, CSTE Staff

Today’s National Public Health Week 2023 theme is Reproductive Health, a subject close to current AEF fellow Bonnie Bloxom. Below, Bonnie shares how she found her way to epidemiology, her time studying abroad and her current work in Maternal Child Health at the Oregon Health Authority. 

“You should try Public Health. Just take the intro course.”

Little did she know at the time, but those ten words from Bonnie Bloxom’s undergraduate academic advisor at Elon University ended up shaping the next course of her career.

She’d always been interested in analytics, research and data, so her advisor asked her to give public health a try. After taking the course, Bloxom was hooked.

“The very first class in the course covered social determinants of health, population levels and global health,” she said. “I thought ‘Wow, this is exactly what I wanted.’ I didn’t know public health existed until this class.”

Bonnie finished her time at Elon University with a B.S in Biology and a B.A. in Public Health Studies. At first interested in medical school, she decided to pursue her newfound passion for public health. Part of the initial course she took covered Global Health, which she found to be particularly inspiring and enjoyed learning.

Bloxom decided she’d like to learn more about a potential career in global health and her next move proved it. She went to graduate school … in Taiwan.

Bonnie received a funded Fulbright grant to attend National Taiwan University, the home of the only internationally accredited master’s program in Public Health. She earned her MPH degree in 2021.

While studying in Taiwan, Bloxom noticed a difference in how public health is practiced there as opposed to the U.S., especially since her time in the country coincided with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

“One of the main differences is just from a cultural perspective”, she said. “There’s an idea of collectivism there — everyone working towards a shared common goal and sacrificing some of your own personal ones for the good of society.”

Specifically, she points to masking, a common and apolitical practice in Taiwan even before the pandemic. Since the significant impact by the 2004 SARS outbreak, masking in grocery stores and public transportation was a part of life.

“During Covid, my Taiwanese classmates asked me: ‘Why is it such a big deal for people to wear masks and to get the vaccine in the United States?’ They have a lot of trust in their government and their public health system.”

As her time in Taiwan was wrapping up, Bonnie looked for her next opportunity back home in the U.S. Through good, old fashion Googling, she learned about CSTE’s Applied Epidemiology Fellowship (AEF). Having spent the past few years immersed in ‘theory’, the chance to work in a local health department and gain on-the-job experience in applied epidemiology appealed to her.

Bonnie applied and was accepted into the two-year program working at the Oregon Health Authority. She’s been there since August 2021 and will graduate later this summer. One aspect of the experience she’s appreciated is working closely with mentors.

“My mentors here in Oregon have just been amazing and I can't speak highly enough of them. They're great.”

Bonnie also mentioned the excitement of the unpredictable day-to-day nature of being a fellow.

“Each week can look different just depending on which projects and what's going on,” Bloxom said. “For example, this past week, I was at a hospital because they had a novel outbreak of a fungus. I was working with their infection preventionist and trying to understand how to prevent this from spreading in the future.”

Outside of the unexpected crisis, Bloxom’s specific area of focus is Maternal Child Health (MCH). She works closely with the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) and publishes its pertinent data. PRAMS is also the cornerstone of a project Bonnie is working on for CSTE.

“It's using six or seven years of PRAMS data and looking at the impact of racial discrimination on prenatal, preconception and postpartum care utilization among pregnant Oregonians. And so that's been taking up a lot of my time reading, writing a literature review and writing up manuscripts.”

After her time in the AEF program ends this year, Bonnie intends to continue her education by attending nursing school. Her ideal work life would be a mix of hands-on clinical work in MCH, but also to continue honing her craft in epidemiology with data and statistics.

“My dream would be to have that sort of dual career where I'm in the clinic, but also working at a state or local health department doing public health as well,” she said. “I hope to combine both my work as a nurse and as an epidemiologist.”

Looking back on her almost two years at the Oregon Health Authority, Bloxom said one overarching theme has popped up again and again throughout her fellowship: The importance of working with the community.

“What I’ve learned is that community-based public health works, community-based epidemiology works. But how can we really engage in true partnership and true community participation with a population? That is really lacking right now.”

Bonnie said that idea hit home even more when she learned about this year’s CSTE Annual Conference theme.

“It's interesting that one of the themes of CSTE this year is working with epidemiology, not on, communities. My immediate thought was ‘We want to do this so badly in Oregon.’”

Bonnie Bloxom is a current fellow at the Oregon Health Authority where she specializes in Maternal Child Health. Hannah has an M.S. in Global Health from National Taiwan University and a B.S. in Biology from Elon University.

For more information on the CSTE AEF program, please visit www.cstefellows.org.

This post has not been tagged.

Permalink
 

Michigan Epi Jim Collins Reflects on His Career and What ‘Community’ Means to Him

Posted By Ben Warden, CSTE, Monday, April 3, 2023
Updated: Friday, March 31, 2023

Michigan Epi Jim Collins Reflects on His Career and What ‘Community’ Means to Him

By Ben Warden, CSTE Staff

Welcome to National Public Health Week 2023! In recognition of today’s theme, Community, we’re kicking the week off by interviewing Jim Collins, MPH, RS, Director of the Communicable Disease Division of the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS). Jim is also the CSTE Surveillance and Informatics Steering Committee Vice Chair. He discussed his career as an epidemiologist and what ‘community’ means to him. Note: This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

Q: What led you to being interested in epidemiology?

A: Back in the early '80s there wasn't much in the news about epidemiology. I was attending Alma College, a small liberal arts school in Michigan, and took a microbiology class that touched on the transmission dynamics of various infectious diseases. It was interesting to me and illustrated a connection between biology and math. At the time, I just wasn't sure where I wanted to go with it. I did know one thing; I've always wanted to see if I could make a positive difference. When I started reading about epidemiology, it made a lot of sense for the work I wanted to do. After graduating from Alma College, I decided to continue my education with an MPH program at the University of Michigan School of Public Health.

A person smiling for the camera Description automatically generated with medium confidence

Q: What was the landscape for young epis back then?

A: When I finished graduate school, the job market for epidemiologists was not nearly as open as it is right now. At the time, I knew I wanted to go into a career focusing on infectious disease, recognizing it would be challenge.  A lot of folks thought infectious disease was passé because of antibiotics and other medical advancements. As we’ve since learned, infectious disease epidemiology will always be an important and dynamic field and that’s one of the reasons that I’m glad to be part of it. 

Q: How did you come to join CSTE?

I was an epidemiologist at the local level for about eight years, but I didn’t learn about CSTE until I worked at the state level. Our State Epidemiologist at the time, Dr. Matthew Boulton, recruited me to come work for the state and encouraged my involvement with CSTE.

Throughout my career at the state health department, our administration has continued to promote engagement with CSTE. I believe they agree that it contributes to our national public health voice and allows for information sharing that serves the greater good of the department and country.  I’ve found that to be absolutely true and I'm grateful for it.

Q: Take me through a typical day?  

A: I am the Director of the Communicable Disease Division at the MDHHS, the state health department. Michigan has a population of about 10 million people. A little over 100 people in my Division work on communicable disease issues, exclusive of HIV. There is still a daily component in my job focused on the COVID-19 response, and I don't see that changing in the immediate future. We talked about how dynamic the field of infectious disease epidemiology is. While we continue to respond to COVID-19, on a different front, we're also actively working on an outbreak of blastomycosis in the Upper Peninsula that's associated with occupational exposures. I don't think there are many typical days in infectious disease epidemiology, but that's one of the many reasons I enjoy it.

Q: Today’s theme for National Public Health week is Community. How does a sense of community help you in your work?

A: In terms of CSTE, there are so many opportunities to learn from partners from across the country that are doing the same work, but in different environments.  After every call or meeting, I leave with at least some notion of how to do our jobs better. I think you must be open-minded to these teaching moments from the community of CSTE colleagues in order to move the field of infectious disease epidemiology forward. Having a community of like-minded people with similar objectives, that share the same passions, the same hopes, the same aspirations, helps tremendously. It's a community that ranges in age, experience, and perspectives. I'm probably on the upper end of the age range for the community we're in, but I think my experience can help contribute. There's so much collective knowledge out there in CSTE and that’s a major aspect to what makes it valuable and productive.

I've been doing this for about 35 years now, but I am still incredibly passionate about public health and epidemiology. I still love the work we do, and I think it's very important.

This post has not been tagged.

Permalink
 

Alice Hamilton: Industrial Health Pioneer and the First Female Epidemiologist

Posted By Killian Edwards, CSTE , Wednesday, March 29, 2023
Updated: Wednesday, March 29, 2023

CSTE celebrates March 2023 as Women’s History Month

As Women’s History Month comes to a close, CSTE is featuring Alice Hamilton, the “first female epidemiologist” and a pioneer in industrial health and safety. We are pleased to celebrate the importance of women in occupational health and epidemiology.

Alice Hamilton: Industrial Health Pioneer and the First Female Epidemiologist

When we think about women fighting for worker protection and workplace reform, images from movies like “Silkwood” and “Norma Rae” may spring to mind – everyday people protesting and trying to better their work environments. Those characters (and their real-life inspirations) made critical improvements, but we can go much further back in history to see the beginnings of women’s influence on safety for all workers.

During the late Industrial Revolution, social reformers like Jane Addams were beginning to lay the groundwork for women’s, children’s, workers’ and immigrants’ rights in the U.S. At Hull-House, a “settlement house” in Chicago, Addams and other reformers lived and worked closely with poor, working-class immigrant families. They focused on addressing the social and health issues created by urbanization and industrialization, including housing shortages and unsanitary living conditions.

Working conditions for the area’s poor also created health issues. However, at that time there were no legal protections for workers in the numerous mills, plants and factories across the country. In fact, no official connection had even been made between occupations and health.

Enter Alice Hamilton, a pioneer in industrial health and safety and the “first female epidemiologist.”

Hamilton was born into a prominent family in Indiana in 1869. She graduated from medical school at the University of Michigan in 1893 and moved into Hull-House several years later, opening a well-baby clinic and treating residents of the settlement house neighborhood.

As she came to know local families, Hamilton saw firsthand the diseases and injuries resulting from dangerous conditions, industrial accidents, and exposure to poisonous substances like lead and mercury. In her autobiography, “Exploring the Dangerous Trades: The Autobiography of Alice Hamilton, M.D.,” she said her experiences at Hull-House aroused her interest in industrial diseases. “Living in a working-class quarter, coming in contact with laborers and their wives, I could not fail to hear tales of dangers that workingmen faced, of cases of carbon-monoxide gassing in the great steel mills, of painters disabled by palsy, of pneumonia and rheumatism among the men in the stockyards.”

In 1910, Hamilton made her first formal investigation into the connection between the workplace and disease. The governor of Illinois appointed a commission to study industrial illness, particularly the high mortality rates due to industrial poisoning in the lead and associated enamelware industries, rubber production, painting trades, and explosives and munitions. Hamilton directed the survey and focused on lead – the most widely used industrial poison – while others on the team reported on arsenic, brass manufacturing, zinc smelting, turpentine and carbon monoxide.

The Illinois report proved the connection between occupation and illness. In 1911, the state’s legislature passed an occupational disease law requiring employers to implement new safety procedures, provide monthly medical examinations for workers in dangerous trades, and report illnesses to the Department of Factory Inspection.

Dr. Karla Armenti, research assistant professor at the University of New Hampshire and a member of the CSTE Occupational Health Subcommittee, stresses the importance of Hamilton’s efforts in making the connection between work and health. “Alice Hamilton’s work at Hull-House was critical, because of course there was no pollution prevention then, no workplace protections,” she said. “Hamilton and Jane Addams really made the link between work and exposure and workers’ health. They were like urban industrial environmentalists.”

Hamilton’s work in Illinois led to similar studies for the U.S. Bureau of Labor. As with the earlier survey, she carefully studied hospital records to connect specific illnesses and occupations and thoroughly investigated factories to learn which processes used dangerous chemicals. Over the years, her many reports for the federal government – first regarding the lead trades, then other dangerous trades – illustrated the high mortality rates in these occupations and brought about many landmark changes in state and federal industrial safety legislation.

CSTE Executive Director Janet Hamilton (no relation to Alice) emphasizes the importance of Hamilton’s perspective as a woman. “We need women in occupational health to really see the women in the workforce, to study the jobs that are often not seen otherwise. It goes back to the roots of epidemiology – demos, the people – if you don’t know or understand the people, you don’t know the questions to ask or the things to look for.” Her grandmother immigrated to the U.S. as a child with only her brother, working as a maid for years. “Definitely no one was looking at her job or the hazards associated with it,” she said.

Alice Hamilton joined the industrial medicine faculty at Harvard Medical School in 1919, becoming the first woman on the Harvard faculty. She taught one semester each year so she could continue her investigative work and return to Hull-House every spring. While at Harvard, she wrote “Industrial Poisons in the United States” (1925), the first textbook in the field, and “Industrial Toxicology” (1934).

Dr. Armenti enjoys teaching her own students about Hamilton in Occupational and Environmental Health classes. “Hamilton looked at the intersection of the social, political and economic worlds and how that connects to public health and worker health,” she said. “Her work was one of the first times people weren’t just responding to illness afterwards but looking to prevent it in the first place.”

After mandatory retirement at age 65, Hamilton continued her focus on social issues, campaigning against McCarthyism and the U.S. war in Vietnam. Recognitions for her 100th birthday included a telegram from President Nixon praising her successes in industrial medicine. She died on September 22, 1970, at the age of 101. Three months later, Congress passed the Occupational Safety and Health Act.

Janet Hamilton believes recognizing Alice Hamilton and her work helps all women in the field. “Seeing people like yourself in elevated positions is so important and can be a great influence,” she said. “It’s so helpful in paving that path. Public health needs are great and many, and the perspectives that women bring that no one else can bring to the table are completely inspiring,” she said.

 

It makes me hope, that the day is not far off when we shall take the next step and investigate a new danger in industry before it is put into use, before any fatal harm has been done to workmen…and the question will be treated as one belonging to the public health from the very outset, not after its importance has been demonstrated on the bodies of the workmen.” – Alice Hamilton

This post has not been tagged.

Permalink
 

Past is Prologue: What Untold Stories of Black Epis Tells Us About Today

Posted By Ben Warden, CSTE, Thursday, February 23, 2023
Updated: Wednesday, February 22, 2023

 

CSTE celebrates February 2023 as Black History Month

In recognition of Black History Month, CSTE spoke with Heather Butts, Assistant Professor of Health Policy and Management at the Mailman School of Public Health at Columbia University in New York. Ms. Butts shared a few unsung Black epidemiologists and their contribution to modern day epidemiology.

Past is Prologue: What Untold Stories of Black Epis Tells Us About Today

Heather Butts is an Assistant Professor at Columbia University and accomplished author. After her first book, African American Medicine in Washington, D.C.: Healing the Capital During the Civil War Era, was published in 2014, she received a curious question from a reader.

“I like your book, but why should we care about this now?”

It’s a sentiment often asked of historians and academics. Professor Butts answered it not with pie-in-the sky platitudes, but with a hardwired belief in how the past can inform today.

“Part of the book was about morphine use during the Civil War and finding that connection between trauma, coping and addiction,” she said. “There’s a direct line from that to what we’re seeing with the rise of the opioid crisis during the COVID-19 pandemic.”

Connecting the dots between past and present is a large part of Professor Butts’ class, “The Untold Stories in U.S. Health Policy History,” which covers the contributions of Black Americans to the history of healthcare, including epidemiology.

“We benefit from these individuals works, and yet they go unnamed,” she said “Their stories are not told. So, we benefit from what they've done for us, but we don't benefit from knowing who they are, and if we knew who they were, we might be able to benefit even more from what they've done.”

In the spirit of Black History Month, Ms. Butts spoke to CSTE about a few unrecognized Black epidemiologists and  the impact of their contributions to modern day.

In 1965, Bernard Challenor was the first Black American appointed to be an Epidemiological Intelligence Service Officer at the CDC. He also worked at the World Health Organization, where he led efforts to vaccinate for and eradicate smallpox.

“[Dr. Challenor] was one of the premier individuals at the School of Public Health at Columbia,” Professor Butts said. “His history and what he accomplished is so underknown that his niece actually contacted me to learn more about him. The reason why I teach the course is really for people to have a better understanding of who some of these individuals are.”

Another underknown name is Rebecca Crumpler, who some claim to be the first Black American woman to earn a medical degree in the U.S. In 1883, she wrote the Book of Medical Discourses, which provided early guidance on maternal and child health.

“Her contributions over 150 years ago to the field of maternal and child health stay with us today,” Professor Butts said. “We just don't know that they’re from her. And that’s problematic.”

Another untold story Professor Butts talked about was Vivien Thomas, a laboratory supervisor who developed a surgical procedure, the Blalock-Taussig shunt, used to treat blue baby syndrome. While doing his work, he was technically classified as a janitor and paid as one.

“It’s distressing,” she said. "You have this Blaylock-Taussig-shunt, and really it should be called the Blaylock-Taussig-Thomas-shunt, or maybe it should be called the Thomas-Blaylock-Taussig-shunt. It’s concerning that we don't know these stories and that they’re just not fully formed.”

Professor Butts stressed that even though these individuals may not officially be known or trained as epis, the work they did contributed to the field. She also draws a line between her historical perspective and the epi method.

“Epidemiology to me is history in real time,” she said. “It’s we see the trends, they happen over time, and if we can take a moment to learn from them, we can see everything old is new again.”

Too many stories of Black History, especially in regards to public health, have slipped through the cracks. Recognizing them is not just about knowing the past … but to also glimpse into the future.

“I think if we can know where we came from, we can have lessons not only to where we are now, but where we are headed, where we could be going,” Professor Butts said.

“To me, that's why knowing our history, our complete history, our full history, it's so critical. It's so instrumental.”

Professor Butts received her Bachelor of Arts from Princeton University. She was a history major, concentrating in American and African American Studies. She received her Juris Doctor from St. John’s University School of Law, her Master of Public Health from Harvard University and her Master of Education from Teachers College, Columbia University.

She is also the co-founder or H.E.A.L.T.H for Youths, Inc. a nonprofit organization that focuses on college readiness and preparation. Her organization partners with 25 programs each year to help more than 1,000 students achieve their dream of going to college.

Read more about Professor Butts and her class, The Untold Stories in U.S. Health Policy History

This post has not been tagged.

Permalink
 

CSTE Hill Update: February 2023

Posted By by Meg Riley, Vice President and Noah Hammes, Policy Associate, CRD Associates, Friday, February 3, 2023
Updated: Friday, February 3, 2023

 

In late December, Congress passed an omnibus spending bill funding federal agencies through the remainder of Fiscal Year (FY) 2023. CSTE was pleased to see its advocacy efforts pay off with an increase to $175 million for the Data Modernization Initiative (DMI) at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Given the wide range of competing budgetary priorities across the federal government, this $75 million increased investment indicates that Congress continues to recognize the importance of modernizing our nation’s public health data systems. The omnibus bill also included $9.2 billion for CDC overall, an increase of $760 million, $350 million for Public Health Infrastructure and Capacity, an increase of $150 million, and $50 million for the new Center for Forecasting and Outbreak Analytics.

After many wins in FY 2023, there are new factors to consider as the FY 2024 appropriations process begins. First, the mid-term elections resulted in a slim Republican majority in the House, with Democrats retaining control of the Senate. House Republicans have continuously expressed a desire to cut spending. As Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) jockeyed to be elected Speaker of the House, reports indicated an informal agreement between him and more conservative members of the Republican party to limit FY 2024 spending to FY 2022 levels. The most drastic of proposed cuts are likely to impact non-defense discretionary spending, as opposed to the military budget. While such draconian cuts will be difficult to achieve with a Democratic Senate and President, we may indeed see protracted funding battles in Congress resulting in continuing resolutions and the threat of government shutdowns down the line.

On January 19, the U.S. reached its statutorily imposed debt ceiling and the Treasury began using extraordinary measures to ensure the federal government could fulfill its credit obligations. Congress must come to an agreement to raise the debt ceiling before the extraordinary measures are exhausted sometime this summer. Conservative Republicans have discussed leveraging the debt ceiling increase to negotiate spending cuts. We will continue to follow this debate and its potential repercussions on future domestic spending, including for critical public health programs.

While the new makeup of Congress and the debt ceiling debate may pose obstacles to further robust increases, CSTE will continue its ambitious advocacy efforts to secure long-term sustained funding for DMI. For FY 2024, CSTE and partners in the Data: Elemental to Health campaign are pushing for a $250 million investment in DMI, which would help further scale up efforts at the federal level, and in State, Territorial, Local, and Tribal (STLT) health agencies. The President’s annual budget request, usually released in February, is expected to be delayed this year.

CSTE is committed to bipartisan action on DMI and will continue to work with legislators on both sides of the aisle to achieve long-term support for a modernized public health infrastructure. COVID-19 and other recent threats have made universally clear the importance of public health surveillance and analytics and have demonstrated the need for robust sustained investment in DMI. While we seek increased appropriations for FY 2024, CSTE and our partners will also continue to call for a dedicated investment of at least $7.84 billion over five years to ensure STLT agencies have modern systems that keep pace with evolving technology.

For more information on CSTE’s DMI advocacy, visit https://www.cste.org/page/DM-2021.

Meghan Riley is vice president and Noah Hames is policy associate at CRD Associates, LLC, which represents CSTE’s interests on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC

This post has not been tagged.

Permalink
 

CSTE President Angela Dunn’s Presidential Priorities Tackle Connectedness and Community

Posted By CSTE, Thursday, December 22, 2022
Updated: Tuesday, December 20, 2022

CSTE President Angela Dunn had her “Public Health” epiphany as a young medical student. During an ER shift, she encountered a young man with late-stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma. He had no health insurance and was essentially told there was nothing the doctors or staff could do for him.

“I understood at that moment that I needed to go into more of a public health policy realm to affect change for people rather than just one-on-one patient care,” she said. “I knew that my interest and skill set would be better used at ensuring people like this gentleman got the care they needed and were diagnosed early so that they could go about their lives in a healthy way.”

Angela saw epidemiology as a natural transition from the clinical sciences she was studying, due to its data-driven methodologies and the detective-like mindset it takes to succeed at the job.

“[Epidemiology] really does speak to the science side of my brain, but then also that desire to make a bigger change at a larger population level really excites me,” she said.

After many years as Utah’s State Epidemiologist, Dunn is now the Executive and Medical Director of the Salt Lake County Health Department. A longtime member of CSTE, she was elected President in June 2022 for the 2022-23 term.

Like the CSTE Presidents before her, Angela has developed and crafted a few presidential priorities to spotlight during her term. Her first priority, “Formalizing Cross Jurisdictional Partnerships,” focuses on maximizing CSTE’s ability to bring together epis to share best practices experiences to help each other out.

“Having that group of people be able to say, ‘Well, here's how I deal with it,’ is really important,” Angela said. “But beyond that, it really is just that sharing of best practices within applied epi across state lines, because when we're able to bounce ideas off each other, that's how we make sure we're all practicing the best public health we can.”

The genesis of this priority came from the isolating early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, where Angela, then still a State Epidemiologist, noticed how much her and her colleagues in other states relied on each other to both keep up morale and share resources.

“It was nice knowing that there was a group of people out there that definitely had your back and understood what you were going through.”

If the community of epis is at the heart of Angela’s first presidential priority, then the community at large is at the heart of her second priority, “Equipping Epidemiologist to Practice Epidemiology WITH Rather Than ON Communities.”

Traditionally applied epidemiologists are very disease focused, describing how a particulate disease could spread, risk factors, etc. However, Angela feels that COVID-19 highlighted that since its typically the same communities that are at the highest risk for many public health diseases, epis need to “work with” communities and not just “talk at” them.

“As epidemiologists, we don't want our data to just sit unused in a spreadsheet,” Angela said. “We want it to be used to improve the health of the community. To do that, the communities must trust what we're doing. It's about incorporating a community perspective into our applied epidemiology, so that we can bring the whole community up and not just talk about one disease.”

While Angela admits her priorities are lofty, she is certain they are achievable in part due to the expertise and resiliency of CSTE members. One story from her pre-COVID days as the Utah State Epidemiologist specifically came to her mind that connects those attributes with both of her priorities.

In 2019, many Utah residents were visiting a camp in Jackson, Wyoming, when a rabid bat exposure occurred. In a very timely matter, Angela had to work and share resources with the Wyoming State Epidemiologist (whom she knew from CSTE) to identify all the individuals at risk, as well as work with the community to disseminate facts and not induce panic. During that time, communication between the two states was easy thanks to the connections that CSTE fosters. That efficiency also translated working with the community in a constructive manner.

“That's part of the bread and butter of applied epidemiology,” she said. “Working across state lines is to be able to work quickly, and that happens better when you know the people on the other side.”

“And honestly, it's because CSTE brings us together.”

 

Angela Dunn, MD, MPH is Executive Director of the Salt Lake City County Health Department, and CSTE President for the 2022-2023 term. For information on CSTE’s Presidential Priorities Award, which is given at the CSTE Conference, please visit https://www.cste.org/page/presidential-priorities-award.

This post has not been tagged.

PermalinkComments (0)
 

CSTE Hill Update: August 2022

Posted By Meg Riley, Vice President and Noah Hammes, Policy Associate, CRD Associates, Monday, August 15, 2022
Updated: Friday, August 12, 2022

 

 

Federal Funding Update

CSTE was pleased to report earlier this year that Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 funding for the Data Modernization Initiative (DMI) at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reached $100 million, a doubling in funding compared to FY 2021. This investment was made after two continuing resolutions and bill passage one day before a deadline that would have led to a government shutdown. With the many competing budgetary priorities across the federal government, we were thrilled to see a substantial increase for DMI. However, further robust and sustained investment is necessary to transform our public health data infrastructure. With our advocacy for FY 2023 funding, we are continuing our efforts to see that through.

For FY 2023, CSTE and partners in the Data: Elemental to Health campaign are calling for $250 million for DMI to help transform our public health data systems. At the start of the FY 2023 federal appropriations process, the president’s annual budget proposed $200 million for DMI, another potential doubling in funding. CSTE’s advocacy then led to proposed funding increases for DMI within the FY 2023 Labor, Health and Human Services, Education and Related Agencies (LHHS-Ed) appropriations bills released in both chambers of Congress. The House Appropriations Committee bill allocates $250 million, a $150 million increase over FY 2022, while the draft Senate Appropriations Committee bill provides $200 million, in line with the president’s budget.

While these numbers are promising, neither the House nor the Senate have passed a LHHS-Ed bill, and the likelihood of passage prior to the end of FY 2022 appears slim. The House Appropriations Committee approved its LHHS-Ed appropriations bill on June 30, but the full House did not pass the legislation before adjourning for August recess. In the Senate, Appropriations Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT) released a chairman’s mark of the bill, but the committee is unlikely to pass any individual appropriations bills this fall.

With FY 2022 funding set to expire on September 30, 2022, and the November mid-term elections approaching, congressional leaders have yet to come to an agreement on overall spending levels. If Congress cannot reach an agreement on FY 2023 spending next month, at least one continuing resolution to extend current funding is imminent. Continuing resolutions can lead to stagnant funding, which can damage the ability of key programs like DMI to continue their work. While we do not anticipate an LHHS-Ed appropriations bill will be enacted on its own, CSTE will continue to advocate for Congress to come to a bipartisan agreement on overall funding that provides increased annual resources for DMI as a first step towards sustainable long-term investment.

The COVID-19 pandemic made it clear to legislators on both sides of the aisle that public health surveillance and analytics are essential in preventing and mitigating disease risk, and sustained federal investment is necessary for these processes to be most effective. In addition to seeking funding through the annual appropriations process, CSTE continues to call for a dedicated investment of at least $7.84 billion dollars over five years, which Data: Elemental to Health estimates is the minimal investment needed to truly transform our public health data systems. The resources we fight for will ensure state, local, tribal, and territorial public health agencies have the means to implement a more effective and sustainable data infrastructure.

Meghan Riley is vice president and Noah Hames is policy associate at Cavarocchi Ruscio Dennis Associates, LLC, which represents CSTE’s interests on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC

This post has not been tagged.

Permalink
 

Five Questions with CSTE’s First Preventive Medicine Fellow: Hariharan Athreya, MD

Posted By Ben Warden, Thursday, June 16, 2022
Updated: Tuesday, June 14, 2022
Dr. Hariharan (Hari) Athreya

April is known as a month of “firsts” – the first flowers of the year bloom, the first days of warmer weather and the first baseball game of the year is played. April 2022 also saw a first for CSTE as it hosted its first Preventative Medicine Fellow, Dr. Hariharan (Hari) Athreya. 

Concurrently with his CSTE Fellowship, Dr. Athreya is finishing up a Fellowship in Preventative Medicine at Emory University. He’s passionate about providing global and community health and addressing health inequities. During his time at CSTE, he graciously sat down for an interview.

Q: Was there a certain “a-ha” moment where you became passionate about Public Health as a career?

A: If I had to pick one, it would be my experience with AmeriCorps during college. I saw that if I cared about social determinants of health and where people were living and how they were living like I was doing … then I would need a public health degree. But to be able to do that I think coupling that with a medical degree would offer the most ability to leverage my skillset and my interest in science. That experience showed me the importance of community health and trying to understand where people are living before just trying to fix them when they come to clinics, and I think that really showed me the importance of public health.

Q: Describe wanting to branch out beyond a traditional medical education to include public health?

A: Early in my medical education I was having a hard time grasping how little it allowed us to be out in the community and understand what was going on with our patients. And I think that medical education can sometimes be siloed in that we don't really understand the context of what we're giving or the context of the people that we're trying to help. And I remember in our medical school I think we only had one half-hour session on what public health meant and didn't feel like that was enough.

I started a program, GoodEats, that raised awareness of how social determinants of health affect clinical outcomes. It was born out of an attempt to help teach fellow medical students and myself about social determinants of health and how that was not just only affecting the patients in our community that came to see us, but how that was impacting our own ability to function as students and learners and be able to be present for our patients.

Q: What’s an average day like for you? 

A: My day to day varies a lot. With CSTE, there's a lot of information to absorb and that's been great. I attend a couple different group meetings daily and then sometimes ad hoc events come up, for instance today there is a White House briefing on the new data modernization initiative.

So, the day is usually sprinkled with three or four meetings and then trying to work on projects that I've been assigned to, that's both continuing projects with CSTE and sometimes projects that have been ongoing. Right now, I'm working on a project around screening for opioid use disorder in primary care clinics, working on a paper on air quality standards and how that affects preventative medicine physicians, doing different data analysis projects for the Georgia Department of Public Health.

Q: What programs or areas of CSTE’s work have interested you the most during your Fellowship?

A: I just sat in on a meeting with the health equity division of CSTE and I think that’s the most interesting [area] to me right now. And then informatics, i.e., the work that Annie Fine (CSTE’s Chief Science and Surveillance Officer) is doing around data modernization and why it's important. There is a balance necessary in trying to improve data systems that will be key for the future. It seems that working on the very local level right now, data is such a challenge to deal with. The questions around how to handle it moving forward is very interesting.

Q: Managing burnout has become a major issue for all health care workers. What have you learned, especially during the pandemic, that has helped you?

A: I think everybody who worked in direct patient care got burned out at some point during COVID, and it's how you pick yourself up from that. For me it was a lot of just trusting or being able to talk to the people around you, and share your experiences, and share your frustrations, and then together kind of resolve to find a better way to do it next time.

I think the answer to that question is one, making sure that you have people you can talk to and be open and vulnerable with when you do feel burned out or low, and then moving on to try to build a better public health infrastructure to avoid feeling burned out in the first place.

Dr. Hari Athreya is preventative medicine fellow at Emory University School of Medicine. He served as CSTE’s first preventative medicine resident in Spring 2022.

This post has not been tagged.

Permalink
 
Page 3 of 23
1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  >   >>   >|